These are some of the more commonly asked questions about BCI.
Lists of collections for different taxonomic groups or geographic regions already exist. Notable examples include Index Herbariorum (IH), Insect and Spider Collections of the World (ISCW) and the BioCASE metadata database. There are also newer projects that are building databases of collections such as Biorepositories.org database for vouchers of molecular data and the CollectionsWeb project for natural history collections in the United States.
These lists overlap in their coverage. A European botanical collection may appear in BioCASE and in Index Herbariorum for example.
The codens or abbreviations issued by these collections (if any) don't have a global scope. There is nothing to prevent 'collisions' between them.
The new generation of large scale biodiversity informatics projects (such as GBIF, EoL and the Atlas of Living Australia) require an integrated set of identifiers that are resolvable to standard metadata for collections.
Users require a single place to go to search the metadata for all collections.
BCI is a bridging application that wraps these extant lists, fills any gaps and provides services to the new, cross disciplinary projects. It will use economies of scale to provide a single set of web services that cover everything — empowering existing curation efforts rather than attempting to replace them.
BCI already reflects the data held in IH, ISCW and Biorepositories.org in its interface. BCI is taking on responsibility for managing the BioCASE CORM dataset and hopes to collaborate in many other projects as the curator of collections metadata. If you curate lists of collections and sub-collections we would like to hear from you via the admin@BiodiversityCollectionsIndex.org.
| Information | [x] | |
|
|
||
| Cancel | ||